With all the hyperbole in the mobile value-added services market,
mCentric thought that it might offer a helpful guide so you
can separate those companies selling mostly hype to those truly
implementing innovative value-added services products. And with
that, mCentric is proud to present (drum-roll please)…
Top Ten Questions to Identify Market
Leading Vendors
1. How many live
implementations of the company’s platform in its current
incarnation are actually in the market?
Many failed portal/download server/product category here vendors
have now decided to call their products a service delivery
platform. Make sure references are relevant and that a wide
range of capabilities are actually being used.
2. How deep is
the company’s activity within its reference customers?
A pilot or two is not deep. One or two low volume services
is not deep. Serving up a large number of critical, high-volume
services within the same operator is deep.
3. Does the company
have references with the very large operators?
Reliability and scalability are more and more important as
the value-added services market matures. Providing services
for upwards of 10-15 million customers is substantially more
demanding than providing services for smaller operators. If
you’ve got real performance needs make sure your vendor
can deliver.
4. Can the company
demonstrate a global support capacity?
In how many countries / continents has the company demonstrated
an implementation capability?
5. How many different
types of services has the company hosted?
A Service Delivery Platform by definition must be broad. Just
doing Java downloads is not broad. Just doing messaging is
not broad. Broad is having a platform that supports everything
from network integration to messaging to portal to downloads
to charging to whatever the service provider has been able
to imagine.
6. Can you provide
manuals for all the previous versions of your product?
It’s easy for the marketing department to call the product
4.x or 5.x. Being able to produce a progression of manuals
for the various product versions demonstrates that the rest
of the company is actually producing what marketing sells.
7. Can the company
demonstrate a history of innovation?
A company’s innovation depends on its vision and on
its ability to incorporate market feedback and transform them
into its next generation product. Being able to trace a logical
historic product evolution bodes well for future innovation.
8. Does the company
number more investment rounds than commercial implementations?
A curious effect tends to appear in the value-added services
market. Those companies with less news about their commercial
implementations tend to be the same ones with lots of news
about new financing rounds to keep the company alive.
9. Does the company
demonstrate a number of years with a consistent focus?
While the company may be on version 3.x or 4.x those versions
may reflect dramatic swings in product strategy so that the
current product is more like New Strategy 1.0 with a portal
or other product representing the earlier versions. If you
need solidity and scalability, make sure you’re buying
a fully evolved product.
10. Is there a solid management
team with a number of years in the company?
There are a lot of weak companies in the value-added services
market. A key sign of company weakness is a recently changed
CEO or other top management figure.
|